Posts Tagged ‘Environmental Sustainability’

ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISM

September 6th, 2009





ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISM



WHAT IS ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISM

Environmental journalism is the collection, verification, production, distribution and exhibition of information regarding current events, trends, issues and people that are associated with the non-human world with which humans necessarily interact. To be an environmental journalist, one must have an understanding of scientific language and practice, knowledge of historical environmental events, the ability to keep abreast of environmental policy decisions and the work of environmental organizations, a general understanding of current environmental concerns, and the ability to communicate all of that information to the public in such a way that it can be easily understood, despite its complexity.

Global Environmental Journalism Initiative

GEJI, the Global Environmental Journalism Initiative, is a project started in 2008 by four Australian and five European universities that are leaders in journalism education in their countries.

It involves

International collaboration in the teaching and learning of journalism about environmental sustainability Students working together locally and globally to produce journalism about environmental sustainability The building of an international archive of research materials and reports on global environmental journalism Background

While the practice of nature writing has a rich history that dates back at least as far as the exploration narratives of Christopher Columbus, and follows tradition up through prominent nature writers like Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau in the late 19th century, John Burroughs and John Muir in the early 20th century, and Aldo Leopold in the 1940s, the field of environmental journalism did not begin to take shape until the 1960s and 1970s.

The growth of environmental journalism as a profession roughly parallels that of the environmental movement, which became a mainstream cultural movement with the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962 and was further legitimized by the passage of the Wilderness Act in 1964. Grassroots environmental organizations made a booming appearance on the political scene in the 1960s and 1970s, raising public awareness of what many considered to be the “environmental crisis,” and working to influence environmental policy decisions. The mass media has followed and generated public interest on environmental issues ever since.

The field of environmental journalism was further legitimized by the creation of the Society of Environmental Journalists in 1990, whose mission “is to advance public understanding of environmental issues by improving the quality, accuracy, and visibility of environmental reporting.” Today, academic programs are offered at a number of institutions to train budding journalists in the rigors, complexity and sheer breadth of environmental journalism.

Challenges

Environmental journalists are expected to be advocates for changes to improve the quality of the planet. They should educate people about the serious state of the environment and use the power of the news media to bring about changes to improve the quality of the air, water, wildlife and natural resources.

Trying to convince people about the importance of protecting the environment sometimes falls on deaf ears, in India and all around the world. Many people are simply not interested; society tends to assume that things like land, trees, plants, animals, and water resources – the resources they depend upon for their livelihoods – will always be there. Overuse or abuse of resources is not, most of the times, an important issue. But catching audiences’ attention is not the only hard thing environmental journalists have to face. Writing about the environment as a core issue for society sets numerous challenges for journalists. These are:-

Lack of environmental and scientific training. Reporters without specialized training might ignore complicated environmental stories altogether or, if they attempt them, the results might be less than satisfactory for readers. Limited access to governmental data on environmental conservation. The existence of forest mafias threatens their professional activities as well as their private lives. Wildlife journalists have to balance the incongruity that comes as a produce of the short attention span that is affecting news consumers in a society that unfolds around consumerism combined with the fact that environmental stories are frequently complex and difficult to report. Citizens’ experiences of many environmental issues are mediated, in large part, by the interests of governmental agencies as well as the private sector (big corporations). These two spheres continually influence the media’s presentation of environmental issues putting at stake public perceptions. In recent years, it seems as though media interest in the environment has taken a backseat to other issues impacting the international scenario. Wildlife journalists have to deal with the priority of other subjects such as terrorism, poverty, economy, politics, and international relations. Journalists have to face the lack of training, resources or support from news editorials or sponsors.

The recognition of these challenges and a solution to them will impact the creation of a collective dialogue and deliberation on environmental issues that are of broad public concern.

Environmental journalism falls within the scope of environmental communication, and its roots can be traced to nature writing. One key controversy in environmental journalism is a continuing disagreement over how to distinguish it from its allied genres and disciplines.

The field of environmental journalism covers a wide variety of topics. According to ‘The Reporter’s Environmental Handbook’, environmental journalists perceive water concerns as the most important environmental issue, followed by atmospheric air pollution concerns, endocrine disruptors, and waste management issues. The journalists surveyed were more likely to prioritize specific, local environmental issues than global environmental concerns.

References Ham, Sam. Environmental Interpretation: A Practical Guide for People with Big Ideas and Small Budgets. West, Bernadette M., M. Jane Lewis, Michael R. Greenburg, David B. Sachsman, and Renée M. Rogers. The Reporter’s Environmental Handbook.

· Blum, Deborah, Robin Marantz Henig, and Mary Knudson. A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers.

Chapman, Graham, Keval Kumar, Caroline Fraser, and Ivor Gaber. Environmentalism and the Mass Media..

.

NANDINI CHAKRABORTY




By: Nandini chakraborty

Environmental Consulting Firms

August 29th, 2009

Environmental Consulting Firms- Environmental Consulting Firms Will Help Your Company Become Truly “Green” and Attain Environmental Sustainability



I know lots of persons, representing small to large companies, who proudly declare, “We are an “ecological” business!” This tag is a euphemism that means they are abiding by strict principles concerning ecological sustainability rules and norms. This “green” tag is in and it is a worthy aspiration, for sure. A lot of companies are jumping on the “band wagon”. They are employing the title as a technique to openly and implicitly promote their services and/or products. However, what does it signify to be “green”? And, how can any size business execute a strategy to comply with ecological sustainability norms to be on the way to growing into an “ecological” business?

Agenda 21 was the main production of the United Nations Conference on environment and development (the, “Earth Summit”). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) presents norms or offers support on good management norms in encouragement of Agenda 21. The ISO 14001 offers its conditions for an Environmental Management System (EMS) that confirms global significance for all size companies wishing to function under environmentally sustainable processes. It is a globally acknowledged requirement. With the aid of environmental consulting firms, the norms can be appropriate for any business, large or small, whatever its product or service, in any industry, and whether it is a commercial venture, a public administration, or a government department.

The principle elements, stated in an EMS are explained below:

1. Environmental Policy Statement (ecological characteristics and effect of products, activities, and services, including intra-and inter-business processes),

2. Planning (ecological characteristics, legal and additional requisites, aims and measurable targets, ecological management programs),

3. Implementation and Operation (configuration and reliability, preparation, conciousness, and competence, communication, ecological management process documentation, document control, operational control, crisis vigilance and response),

4. Checking and Corrective Action (checking and measurement, non-conformance and counteractive- and protecting- action, documentation, ecological management process audit)

5. Management Review

Well, you’re probably thinking, “I’m a little overwhelmed by all of this! And, what can I do to really denote my business is “green”?” It’s completely probable in your business your Environmental Management System is only an approach for doing things that you believe are “green”, e.g., turning out lights, recycling, walking or biking to work, etc. (Don’t get me wrong! These are all important things to do.). But your process isn’t on paper and likely acknowledged only by one or some persons in management with little or no communication. Everyone has the “green essence” and every one is contributing by doing his or her personal action.

Not all organizations will wish to go through the ISO 14000 certification procedure (lots of large organizations do). Businesses that don’t wish to become certified can execute the norms to be considered as third party compliant. Environmental consulting firms can suggest several methods to execute an “ecological” business system that minimizes harmful outcomes on the environment caused by its actions in an effort to attain continual development of its ecological execution:

1. Plan – Define aims and make plans (examine your company’s situation, define your general aims and establish your temporary targets and develop plans to achieve them.

2. Do – Execute your plans (do what you defined).

3. Check – Evaluate your outcomes (evaluate/check how far your real accomplishments encounter your set aims.

4. Act – Fix and improve your plans and how you implement them (fix and understand from your errors to improve your plans in order to get best outcomes next time.

The thoughts that go into your strategy are derived from your specialized discipline type. The deepness and detail is also driven by your business’ size, but lots of the similar rules apply:

- Waste and toxics elimination that includes, but is not limited to, product making, materials, manufacturing procedures, distribution, consumer and end of life for products you utilize in your every day business actions or products that you sell to others,

- Toxics decrease and elimination (“The Ban List”),

- Decrease Greenhouse gas emanations by performing teleconferencing and web conferencing instead of traveling,

- Location and decrease of wastes,

- Buy automobile hybrids,

- Other Transport (walking, car pooling, biking, public transportation),

- Community involvement and volunteering,

- Decrease utilization of non-biodegradable products (plastics),

- Enroll and contribute with groups devoted to giving control, observing field and implementing obedience,

- Buy from ISO 14000 certified sellers and manufacturers with active plans for soil, groundwater, surfacewater, and air regulations in third world countries that are defensive of human health and the environment (to US Environmental Protection Agency norms),

- Utilize used products,

- Protect resources (e.g., water),

- Substitute ineffective equipment that consumes power,

- Help and support state and local government (towns, counties) to establish and implement ecological sustainability policy, guidelines and regulations for companies that want to run business in their areas,

- Join organizations in your specialized field that help you in executing ecological sustainability for your services and products,

- Take action following Best Management Practices (e.g., reusing).

The objective of any EMS, directing to ecological sustainability, and the goal of environmental consulting firms, is to decrease our carbon trail on the world. I hope I have been successful in increasing your attentiveness, awareness and integrity about what “green” means. Today it’s time for action! In the future after your business builds and executes an EMS program you can be proud to represent that your business is “green”.

www.VernonEnvironmental.com – Environmental Consulting Firms




By: environmentalconsultingfirms

Real business improvement from integrated management systems

August 22nd, 2009

integrated management systems in your business will provide you with the tools to manage effectively. If you have more than one system, confusion and duplication occur unless these are integrated. The risk management approach in internationally recognized standards caters very well for this integration which can and should be consistent across all areas of the business.

Environmental management (ISO 14001), occupational health and safety, quality management food safety or HACCP and financial management can very readily be integrated. All the systems are risk based and suggest a consistent risk management tool within a business. Quality can be an exception because the risk based approach is optional. In the new carbon constrained economy the business can also include its accounting for its carbon footprint as part of its environmental sustainability.

What is crucial to making an integrated system work effectively is having straightforward procedures that are process based and cover all risks with a single reporting mechanism for the initial report of incidents, near misses and suggestions. Workers easily become confused by too many forms and instructions and then ignore them. Workers can find that having separate stand alone systems in very confusing and may even pu tthem in a position of being presented with conflicting instruction.

During the implementation phase you do need to separate your decision making about different activities because the risk of environmental harm from a single activity many be very different from the occupational safety risk of the same activity. An example in the agribusiness field would be the use of hydrogen peroxide which breaks down readily to form water and oxygen. This is approved for use in organic farming indicating that it is environmentally safe. However from an occupations health and safety viewpoint it is a very hazardous liquid because it breaks down too easily and can extremely dangerous for personnel to handle in larger quantities.

Where there is a difference in risk assessment as in the example given, the highest risk is the one that needs to be controlled using a combination of instructions, training, checklists, maintenance, equipment and contingency planning.

One of the biggest pitfalls for a business with a fully integrated management system can be inflexible Government inspectors from organizations like the national quarantine inspection service, the work place safety inspectors and the environment protection authority who only want to see their own issue and have no real concern about the effective operation of the business outside their narrow tunnel. The pressure that these people assert needs to be resisted without alienating them because they are present for only a few days and are not the people with the responsibility for managing the business and making a profit so that the business remains sustainable. Separating the varying incident reports into separate files usually appeases inspectors who need only look at their own area. There are also real business benefits from this separation because it is easy to analyze problem areas and build in continual improvement.

A fully integrated management system is simply the way that the organization does business and it is hard to see how a mix of management systems can be truly effective if they are not integrated.




By: Jean Cannon